Data follies continue

During the gold rush in 1849 a couple of doctors and an interesting character, a surveyor/glass blower/instrument maker, began taking rainfall measurements in San Francisco. They sold this data to local newspapers and an almanac. In 1871 the army signal service began official recordings.

In spite of the fact that the US GOVERNMENT has recorded the precip data since 1871 the data does not appear to be available from the NCDC. They refer you to the National Archives, of which only a small portion has been scanned.

While cruising the NCDC site I did find an extremely cool ENSO index based on rainfall records from northern China from 1470. It seems one can get index from pre-columbian (yes, that is 22 years before Columbus sailed the ocean blue) rainfall data from China but nothing from late ninteenth century San Francisco!!

Posted in Climate | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

What is going on here?

I was going to do a little excel graph plotting a nice el nino/viejo index readily available from the Japanese Meterological Association (JMA) from 1864 to present against precipitation for the same period in the San Francisco area. I am quite certain that SF precip data are available somewhere since at least 1848. I was appalled to find that it is virtually impossible to get simple historical climate data online. It strikes me that we have spent millions if not billions of dollars funding the National Climate Data Center and like state agencies. This information should be readily available.

Try googling “precipitation data for (your town) from 1860 to present”. What I get is a few irrelevant sites for extreme weather events, current condidtions, and maybe a reference to the NCDC. The National Climate Data Center clearly does not want to dispense the raw data, which in my opinion is their charter.

The google tally very quickly segues to global warming this and climate change that. Exactly the tone of the NCDC site . I’m not asking for an opinion, just give me the data.

The problem seems to boil down to the notion some in the scientific community have that they are uniquely qualified to read and interpret the scripture. Like the Catholic Church in the Middle Ages, they would have us  kneel in the knave while they drone in latin…

Posted in Climate, Climate Change, Geography | Tagged | 1 Comment

Climate Change

Been getting up to speed on what I feel is the salient geoscientific issue of our time. We really need to get this one right. The stakes are enormous and the emotional pitch of the climate war is increasing.

On one side we have 1970’s computer geeks and their scientific progeny who have done an enormous amount of valuable work synthesizing the efforts of previously disconnected fields of oceanography, climatology, geology, astronomy, ecology, and the paleo versions of the former; and reduced much of this to physics and mathematical formulae that can be used in computer models. The models and the formulae have had considerable success replicating second and third order emergent properties of the ocean-atmospheric circulation. They have parlayed this success into prominent positions in NASA and the equivalents in western governments, and they warn of impending disaster if fossil fuel burning continues apace.

On the other side, lead scientifically by geologists and paleo folks with a long-term perspective, aided by skeptical statistical analysts, and aligned with successful business people attuned to pragmatic risk analysis; many argue that the computer models are inaccurate, the risks overblown, and that the costs of mitigation vastly exceed the costs of the problem.

One can understand the emotional pitch. One side earnestly believes it is saving the planet, and the other side that it is saving our way of life, and the possibility that the rest of the world can ever enjoy our standard of living.

 

Posted in Climate | Leave a comment

How to get your arms around a billion years

Any dog knows that humans have very poor senses of hearing and smelling. We don’t have a very good sense of time either. We really have no sense of our own lifespan, let alone a billion years.

Our planet is thought to have condensed from a dust cloud about 4.2 billion years ago. We used to think there was about a billion years of peace on earth before life germinated, but it keeps getting pushed back to 3.6 and maybe 3.8 billion years ago. I find myself thinking that a mere half billion years from the formation of the planet to the beginning of life is surprisingly short, given how inhospitable it was back then. I am actually thinking that a half a billion years is short!

Here is a picture of a crazy guy with his arms around 1.2 billion years in the Grand Canyon.

The layers of sediments are about a mile deep and they can be read like a book, but a lot of pages have been torn out here. This happens when an area is uplifted for a while and the sediments get washed off.

There is just enough time in the billion years remaining for life on earth for a mountain range like the Rockies to be buried under a mile of sediments, for a river to cut down through it, and for some unimaginable creature with a better sense of time than ours to ponder it.

Posted in History of Life | Leave a comment

A starting point.

Astronomers tell us we only have a billion years left before a senescent sun burns us out of here. This is a haha at a facebook timescale, but in the big picture it means that life on earth is very late middle aged in human terms.

We feel a deep kinship with all the life that has passed before, from human ancestors to the first shrewlike mammals that inherited the earth from the dinosaurs, to the first fish to venture on to land, and all the way back to the first organic molecules that replicated. We use “we” in the big sense to include all life that has come before and what will follow.

We are curious. If cold, salty ocean water that was beginning it’s descent to the abyssal plain when the Vikings were sacking England is resurfacing today, with upwelling that alternates between the eastern and western pacific every thirty years in the PDO (Pacific Decadal Ocillation), and more frequently but less regularly in the ENSO (El Nino Southern Ocillation), what would have been going on for most of earth history when there was a panthalassic ocean and the continents were smaller and more clustered than they are today?

Posted in Climate | 1 Comment