What is it with squares in nature anyway?

Homo ad Quadratum

Homo ad Quadratum

Actually, perfect squares are extremely rare in nature. Squares are human constructs.

We imagine Pythagoras and the Greek philosophers drawing their squares in the sand, dividing the sides equally, connecting the divisions, and counting the resulting smaller squares to develop the concept of a number multiplied by itself. The concept is probably much older. Both the Babylonians and the Egyptians had methods for calculating volume based on squared empirical approximations of Pi.

It is easy to imagine our forebears drawing a square around a circle to get the notion that the area of the circle varied with the radius squared. If that were the end of it one could dismiss it as the artifact of a practical approach, but these squares keep coming back.

Newton’s laws of gravitation vary the square of distance. Gravity? We’re a long way from geometric lines in the sand now.

E=MCsquared is Einstein’s formula for the relationship (relativity) of mass and energy. The speed of light squared?

Yagahhdabekiddnme! Why not the cube root or something…

This entry was posted in Anthropology, History, What's going on here?. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to What is it with squares in nature anyway?

  1. Pingback: Say Watt? Or Why I Just Love Math | geosciencebigpicture

  2. Pingback: Energy and Matter | geosciencebigpicture

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.